Most Popular Stories
- 3 ways for CIOs to become business leaders
- FBI insists cloud providers meet strict security requirements
- Nearly half of U.S. businesses to have mobile apps this year
- Multiple monitors makes some multitasking faster, easier
- 10 tips to keep Anonymous away
- Windows Phone 8 rumors sound good for business users
Events
- COMPTEL PLUS Spring 2012
April 15-18 — San Francisco, CA - The AIIM Conference 2012
March 20-22, 2012 — San Francisco, CA - Northwestern University Master's in Information Systems
- The AIIM Conference 2012
March 20-22, 2012 — San Francisco, CA
Sponsored Links
Free Newsletter
HOT TOPICS >> The tech world's top flops and fiascos of 2011 | Top 8 features in Windows 8 | Paul's Q&As
INDUSTRY >> Healthcare IT | Government IT | Financial Services IT | Biotech IT | Compliance IT
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Whitepaper: Integrated Analytics and WCM Can Improve Performance & ROI
- Is Corporate Liability Robbing YOU Blind?
- The Maturity of GRC in the Public Sector: Where are We Today? Where are We Going?
- Storage Consolidation: Best of Both Worlds
- Security Intelligence: Enabling Security Monitoring for Landscapes
- Reporting 2.0 – The next evolutionary step in web based business reporting
Symantec: Microsoft patches fastest
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fastest of them all? If you're talking about security patches, it looks like the answer is Microsoft. Contrary to popular belief, Microsoft was found to be the overall fastest when it comes to patching vulnerabilities, in security vendor Symantec's latest security report on the malware industry. Covering the period from July 1 to December 31, 2007, the comprehensive report reveals that Microsoft released a total of 60 patches over the course of 2007, with an average patch time of 18 days during the first half of the year, and just six days during the second half. In second place was Red Hat, with an average patch time of just over a month--quite a bit higher than Microsoft. Meanwhile, Apple, HP and Sun all lag far behind.
For more on the report:
- see this Ars Technica article
Related Stories
- ALSO NOTED: Windows XP turns five; Cisco to buy Orative; and much more...
- Ex-Hacker: Apple is not more secure than Microsoft
- Symantec identifies top rogue security software
- Microsoft plans out-of-band patch this Tuesday
- Just one security bulletin for Patch Tuesday in May
- Is it only a myth that Firefox is more secure?
- ALSO NOTED: Gartner: 80% of apps to use open-source by 2012; Flash drives get serious about security;
- Hackers exploiting unpatched Windows DNS bug
- Vista: Most secure OS after 90 days?
- ALSO NOTED: How to: Run Linux within Windows; Verizon's EV-DO network goes Rev A;
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| EditorsTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |




