Most Popular Stories
- One on One with Arpan Shah of Microsoft Sharepoint
- IBM will snag half of India's outsoucing work by 2010
- Vendors prepare for Obama's electronic medical records change
- Teen sends 14,528 text messages in a single month
- Coke uses RFID for drink dispensers
- Forrester report predicts web content management will grow in spite of economy
Events
- CTO Telecom Summit
Nov 8-11, 2009 — Four Seasons Resort – Scottsdale, AZ
Sponsored Links
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Content Monitoring and Filtering and Data Loss Prevention
- Forrester Consulting: Optimizing Users and Applications in a Mobile World
- Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata
- IM and Presence: Achieving Mission Critical Status in the Enterprise
- SaaS Vendor Selection Manual
- Why Traditional Monitoring Tools Cannot Deliver True Mobile User Management for the BlackBerry Platform
Q&A: Morgan Gillis of the LiMo Foundation

FierceWireless editor Brian Dolan and I recently sat down with Morgan Gillis, executive director of the U.K.-based LiMo Foundation, to discuss how LiMo differs from the OHA, whether there's room for two open-source consortiums in the wireless industry and what challenges Google faces with the launch of the Android platform. Here's a little taste:
FierceDeveloper: While Google has promoted the openness of its platform for the end user, it still seems like that will eventually be determined by the way a mobile carrier adopts the Android platform. Is that true for LiMo's platform as well?
Gillis: Ultimately, the openness of the handset is determined by the operator. Google has set up their stall where they are heavily promoting openness, and I'm sure they do really mean openness in terms of how the handset is offered to the user, but whether that's achieved or not is, I'm sure, dependent on the marketing policy of the carrier concerned... It's for that reason that I wasn't surprised at all to see that Google was assembling an industry consortium. I thought it was very understandable that last week the message that they really wanted to get across, first and foremost, was that they were engaging with the mobile industry rather than attempting to take over the industry or disintermediate the industry.
For the full interview:
- head over to the FierceDeveloper website
Related Stories
- Android SDK frustrating developers?
- Android prototype spotted in the wild
- Google to update Android SDK
- Linux ecosystem pegged at $25B
- Videos: Google Android demos
- First look: Google's Android OS
- Android Developer Challenge: $10M in prizes
- ALSO NOTED: AT&T talking to Google and the OHA?; Vonage loses Verizon appeal;
- BlackBerrys? Not at this Thanksgiving table
- Verizon to support Google Android
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2009 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |







Click here to get the FierceCIO:TechWatch email newsletter for FREE!
Be the first to comment