Most Popular Stories
Events
- Healthcare IT Institute
May 2nd-4th — Atlanta, GA - TM Forum Management World 2010
18-20, May — Nice, France - AIIM Expo + Conference
April 20-22, 2010 — Philadelphia, PA - A&D Cybersecurity Forum
March 31-April 1 — Washington, DC
Sponsored Links
HOT TOPICS >> Solid State Drives | IT Security | Open Source | ARM Processors | Google Chrome 4
INDUSTRY >> Healthcare | Government | Financial Services | Biotech | Compliance
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Microsoft SharePoint Alternative: A Comparison of Online Collaboration Software with Microsoft SharePoint
- Staying Abreast of Group Policy Changes
- Consumption-Based Fundamental Asset Allocation Redefines Investing -- Relevant Investing in a Post-Collapse Era
- Cost-Effective Compliance with FDA Regulations for Your SAP Applications
- Extending Change Auditing to Exchange Server
- Securing the Cloud
Microsoft to security vendors: Hands off my kernel
As you might recall, on Monday we reported on McAfee's public shaming of Microsoft in an advertisement printed in the Financial Times that took the form of an open letter to "computer users around the world." In the ad, McAfee accused Microsoft of incorporating "inherent weaknesses" into their upcoming Vista operating system. Well, The New York Times reports today that other major security companies have joined the fray, making their grievances known both publicly and to officials in the justice department and the European Commission.
So what's all the hubbub about? Turns out that Microsoft is launching their own security solution with Vista and in true Microsoft fashion, they're locking third-party security companies out of the Windows kernel--at least in the 64-bit version of Vista. Additionally, Microsoft's own Windows Security Center will be front and center in Vista and you can bet it won't be easy to disable or uninstall.
Well, obviously, these security companies aren't all too happy that the functionality of their products is being circumscribed by Microsoft (who is now also a direct competitor). But what about the rest of us? Would your enterprise entrust Microsoft with desktop security? Will this prevent you from deploying the 64-bit version of Vista--or from deploying Vista at all? Write in and let me know and I'll post your responses in a future editor's corner.
For more on Vista security concerns:
- see this New York Times article
Related Stories
- Microsoft debuts draft PatchGuard workarounds
- Security vendors irate with Microsoft
- Microsoft security meeting crashes--no, seriously
- Microsoft to meet with security vendors
- Microsoft relents to security vendors' demands
- Vista security: the saga continues
- ALSO NOTED: McAfee blasts Vista; Windows XP site misleads Firefox users; and much more...
- Third Symantec report finds Vista bugs
- McAfee CEO: Microsoft competition will be beneficial
- Malware now targeting the Mac OS
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2010 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |






