Most Popular Stories
- One on One with Arpan Shah of Microsoft Sharepoint
- IBM will snag half of India's outsoucing work by 2010
- Vendors prepare for Obama's electronic medical records change
- Teen sends 14,528 text messages in a single month
- Coke uses RFID for drink dispensers
- Forrester report predicts web content management will grow in spite of economy
Events
- CTO Telecom Summit
Nov 8-11, 2009 — Four Seasons Resort – Scottsdale, AZ
Sponsored Links
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Accelerating the Next Phase of Virtualization
- Forrester Consulting: Optimizing Users and Applications in a Mobile World
- What Every CXO Should Know About the "Web 2.0"
- Microsoft Exchange Alternative: HyperOffice vs. MS Exchange
- Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata
- Why Traditional Monitoring Tools Cannot Deliver True Mobile User Management for the BlackBerry Platform
IBM unveils new Virtual Linux Desktop software package
With their sights firmly set on erroding Microsoft's sizable, but falling marketshare of desktop computers, IBM has teamed up with Canonical and Virtual Bridges to offer a new Linux-based virtual desktop solution. As its name suggests, Virtual Linux Desktop (VLD) works by squeezing multiple virtualized desktop images onto a server, and is being positioned as a cost-effective alternative to Microsoft's Windows desktop operating system.
Because VLD comes packaged with applications such as e-mail, word processing and other standard software, IBM says using VLD, as opposed to software from Microsoft, will save businesses about $500 to $800 per user. Taking it one step further, it is also possible to save up to $358 per user in hardware-related savings by not having to upgrade to accommodate the greater computational demands of Windows Vista. Because the desktops are virtualized in servers, cooling and reduced power could yield yet more savings ranging from $60 to $218 per user.
Forrester Research analyst Natalie Lambert does not agree that this represents competition to Microsoft, though. Other than the fact that Microsoft's market share is just too big to be defeated so easily, Lambert noted that, "The solution does not mesh with the way most enterprises are currently using virtualization technology."
To read more about this story:
- check out this article at TechNewsWorld
Related Article:
IE market share slips under 70 percent; Windows drops below 90 percent
Related Stories
- Windows Server 2008 pricing announced
- Windows 7's "XP Mode" has potential to be a support nightmare
- Intel Nehalem processor comes to servers
- Cisco launches into the server market
- Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization goes into beta
- Microsoft tells of three-pronged strategy to beat VMware
- IT certification practice exams pose risks
- Microsoft working on Windows replacement
- Two tech giants don't meet expectatons
- ALSO NOTED: Gartner: 80% of apps to use open-source by 2012; Flash drives get serious about security;
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2009 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |







Click here to get the FierceCIO:TechWatch email newsletter for FREE!
Be the first to comment