FierceCIOFierceCIOTechWatchFierceMobileITFierceContentManagementFierceGovernmentIT   FierceVoIPFierceHealthITFierceFinanceIT

FTC: Bloggers must disclose payments, freebies

Tools
Tags
bloggers
Federal Trade Commission
Facebook
Twitter
Advertisements

In the first update to its guidelines for advertisers since 1980, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have released new guidelines that require bloggers to disclose any payments or free gifts they might have received when doing a review or endorsement of a product or service.

According to a report on Computerworld, the FTC will make decisions on a "case-by-case" basis, though bloggers who make an endorsement must "disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service." The new rule goes into effect on December 1.

What is not so clear is how the ruling will be enforced, if at all. What makes the matter more complex though, would be its far-ranging repercussion in the blogosphere. For example, consider the hypothetical situation in which a blogger has at one time received a freebie from a large vendor. Does that mean that a blogger will now have to acknowledge the freebie on every "endorsement" henceforth, and on every product made by the vendor?

It is also unclear what constitutes an "endorsement"--this might range from a blog entry, to a Facebook comment or even a Tweet. Too bad if you genuinely like another product made by the same company, and want to recommend your friend to use it. This starts to look even more awkward when you consider the USB flash drives and other small gifts that are often given out as part of press kits at trade shows or conferences. Do those count as freebies too?

In fact, Caroline McCarthy of CNET News suggests that even signing up as a Facebook fan of a hotel, for example, could mean that the hotel name would show up beside the name to the person's friend. This is theoretically an infringement, if no disclosures are made. Is a disclosure possible in the previous example? What about for a 140-character tweet?

Richard Cleland, associate director for the FTC's advertising division is uncompromising about the guidelines, "You may have to say a little bit of something else, but if you can't make the disclosure, you can't make the ad."

For more on this story:
- check out this article at CNET News
- check out this article at Computerworld

Related Articles:
FTC plans online marketing rules
New guidelines for tracking consumers online
Companies look to stop leaks to bloggers

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceCIO:TechWatch Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

That is an infringement of the free speech of publishers, not to mention the environmental impact of wasting everybody's time explaining their advertising connections. It will definitely shut down Twitter, since 90% of Twitter is spam? What the hell are the lawyers in the US smoking, they can't challenge anything? Forcing publishers to pay for extra bandwidth and labor will amount to infringement when those articles meant to be published are financially censored or from the loss of income from delays? Can you imagine Time Magazine explaining every possible financial connection to every word in an article?

These Liberal Crack Smoking (they act like it?) politicians need to resign and let adults run the show before they destroy America?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.