Most Popular Stories
Events
- Register for IT Roadmap Dallas 2010
September 14 — Dallas Convention Center - SharePoint Technology Conference
October 20 - 22 — Boston, MA - Northwestern University Master of Science in Information Systems (MSIS)
- Register for The Security Standard 2010
September 13 - 14 — New York, NY
Sponsored Links
HOT TOPICS >> Q2 Earnings Roundup | Cloud Computing | Tablets | Security Vulnerabilities and Exploits
INDUSTRY >> Healthcare IT | Government IT | Financial Services IT | Biotech IT | Compliance IT
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Whitepaper: Integrated Analytics and WCM Can Improve Performance & ROI
- 5 Must Haves in your Information Management Strategy
- Reporting 2.0 – The next evolutionary step in web based business reporting
- The Shortcut Guide to Secure, Managed File Transfer
- Durable Smart Devices for Mobile Field Forces: Selection and Evaluation Criteria
- Cloud Computing: How To Make Your Own Silver Lining
We never sell or give away your contact information. Our reader's trust comes first.
Application performance set to be next virtualization headache
A new problem is starting to rear its ugly head in the spanking new post-virtualized data centers: The issue of guaranteeing the performance of running applications. Stacking multiple virtual machines on a single physical server reduces excess processing capacity and it is wonderful in terms of energy conservation, but has this made it harder to ensure the same level of performance across the board?
Summing up the issue, Andi Mann, a virtualization analyst with Enterprise Management Associates noted, "With a 1-to-1 relationship in a physical environment, you knew exactly what headroom you had to accommodate peak loads." In the past, a mix of good judgment and existing tools were adequate; now, technology such as VMware's VMotion shifts virtual machines across disparate physical servers.
While the "big four" systems management vendors are putting efforts into boosting the strength of their virtual application management capabilities, efforts so far have fallen short. Among other things, they do not have adequate oversight into the exact components that may cause problems, such as internal software switches or the state of storage I/O. Much must me done, but the crucial need to monitor application performance is clear.
For more on this story:
- check out this article at InformationWeek
Related Articles:
Overloaded Apple servers frustrate iPhone users
Cisco unveils rackmount servers to complete data center lineup
Cisco launches into the server market
Cisco plans big foray into server market
Google: We will complete stalled data centers
Data centers: Growth or stagnation
Related Stories
- Gartner: VMs are less secure than non-virtual counterparts
- IBM targets online Tivoli service at SMBs
- New IEEE standards to ease virtual networking headaches
- Beta of Windows 7 SP1 now available to business testers
- No timeline for release of client hypervisor, says VMware
- Citrix unveils new XenClient bare-metal desktop hypervisor
- Steady growth in cloud server market through 2014, says IDC
- Who is managing your virtual resources?
- Survey shows mission-critical workloads being run on VMs
- Microsoft to unveil new licensing policies for virtual machines
Comments
Post new comment
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2010 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |







