Most Popular Stories
- Chrome 17's new features enhance speed, security
- Bug in Trendnet webcams exposes them to public viewing
- Spotlight: Intel launches 520 Series solid-state drive
- Apple's iPad 3 will be unveiled first week of March, says report
- Microsoft: How Windows 8 on ARM will be different
- There's no escaping the app economy
Events
- The AIIM Conference 2012
March 20-22, 2012 — San Francisco, CA - Northwestern University Master's in Information Systems
- CIO Healthcare Summit
March 11-14 — Scottsdale, AZ - COMPTEL PLUS Spring 2012
April 15-18 — San Francisco, CA
Sponsored Links
Free Newsletter
HOT TOPICS >> The tech world's top flops and fiascos of 2011 | Top 8 features in Windows 8 | Paul's Q&As
INDUSTRY >> Healthcare IT | Government IT | Financial Services IT | Biotech IT | Compliance IT
Free Newsletter
Latest News
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Whitepaper: Integrated Analytics and WCM Can Improve Performance & ROI
- The E-discovery Toolbox: What you should look for in a unified e-discovery solution
- The Data Center in Your Future
- Durable Smart Devices for Mobile Field Forces: Selection and Evaluation Criteria
- CSO White Paper - Desktop Virtualization: Empowering Information Security
- IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IT ASSETS THROUGH BETTER COMMUNICATION WITH THE IT INDUSTRY
AMD's 65nm chips plagued by leakage issues?
Been wondering where those high-speed, 65nm Opterons are? Yeah, me too. If a poster on the Investor's Hub forums is to be believed, the reason for the chips' notable absence might be a leakage issue. An analysis of AMD's 65nm Process Variation revealed what might be a leakage problem that's preventing the company from manufacturing 65nm chips faster than about 2.6Ghz. "I think these results are pretty interesting, and may explain why AMD has not been able to ramp 65nm," writes the mysterious forum poster "wbmw." "The leakage is killing them, and only their lowest leaking parts are able to hit 2.6GHz at 1.35V, and still maintain a reasonable power envelope." If true, this could spell more trouble for the already embattled company, as it attempts to ramp up production for its 65nm Barcelona parts. "Until the firm gets the process under control, it will not be able to meet or exceed the clock speeds achieved on the 90nm process," The Inquirer writes. "This also has some pretty ugly implications for Barcelona's ramp, and AMD in general."
For more on the rumored leakage issue:
- see this detailed post from the Investor's Hub forums
- and this article from the Inquirer
Related Stories
- AMD launches Quad-Core Opteron
- Intel: Out with the old, in with the new
- AMD launches Intel-slandering website
- Intel's 45nm Penryn chips to arrive this year
- Intel launches UMPC line, new quad-core chip
- Intel invests billions in 45nm manufacturing process
- Intel to deliver 3.0Ghz quad-core Xeon
- AMD drops power-efficient, 65nm chips
- Six-core chips from Intel, AMD to debut soon
- AMD Phenoms delayed
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| EditorsTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |




