<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fiercecio.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>BitTorrent</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comcast to set monthly bandwidth limits</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/comcast-set-monthly-bandwidth-limits/2008-08-29?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Beginning October 1, Comcast, the largest provider of cable broadband in the U.S., will impose a monthly limit of 250 gigabytes of bandwidth on residential users.&amp;nbsp;Customers who exceed the 250 G-byte limit will be warned to curtail their use.&amp;nbsp;A one year service suspension will result should the limit be exceeded again in the next six months.&amp;nbsp;This is a departure from the current situation where Comcast will contact high-bandwidth users should they cross an internal threshold.&amp;nbsp;The current cap comes on the heels of the&amp;nbsp;FCC ruling that Comcast violated net neutrality principles with their attempts to throttle BitTorrent traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To find out more about this new move by Comcast:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;PC World &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/150451/comcast_sets_monthly_bandwidth_limit_for_customers.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/comcast-set-monthly-bandwidth-limits/2008-08-29#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bandwidth-cap">Bandwidth Cap</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/comcast">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/g-byte-limit">G-byte Limit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/net-neutrality">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:33:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64998 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC set to vote against Comcast</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/fcc-set-vote-against-comcast/2008-07-29?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If reports are to be believed, the majority of FCC commissioners will vote in favor of punishing Comcast for secretly impeding BitTorrent peer-to-peer file sharing on its network.&amp;nbsp;Scheduled to take place at the FCC on Friday, the entire case stemmed from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/broadband_network_management/fp_et_al_nn_declaratory_ruling.pdf&quot;&gt;request&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;(pdf)&lt;/em&gt; submitted by the Free Press in November 2007.&amp;nbsp;On the other hand, Comcast and their supporters &lt;a href=&quot;http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3907&quot;&gt;do not agree&lt;/a&gt; that the FCC has the authority to impose any penalty.&amp;nbsp;(You can read up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10000821-38.html&quot;&gt;more arguments to the effect here&lt;/a&gt;) Personally, while I am all for unrestricted Internet access, I question if any Internet Service Provider (ISP) can maintain viability in the face of unrestricted network utilization.&amp;nbsp; Will punishments force ISPs to eventually revert back to metered Internet, or simply spur greater competitiveness?&amp;nbsp;Only time will tell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on this debacle:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;BetaNews &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/FCC_likely_to_punish_Comcast_for_blocking_P2P_file_sharing_traffic/1217260328&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/fcc-set-vote-against-comcast/2008-07-29#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/comcast">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/internet-service-provider-isp">Internet Service Provider (ISP)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/p2p-0">P2p</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:01:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64771 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google to develop software to detect ISP throttling</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/google-develop-software-detect-isp-throttling/2008-06-17?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Always vocal about its stance in favor of net neutrality, Google has finally thrown down the gauntlet and declared that it is working on software tools that will enable users to detect whether their broadband connections are being manipulated by their ISPs.&amp;nbsp;This was revealed by the Senior Policy Director for Google, Richard Whitt, who said this during a panel discussion at Santa Clara University.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Whitt, the idea is that customers at least be able to find out if they are being throttled, and then let their unhappiness be known to their ISPs.&amp;nbsp;Not everyone agrees though.&amp;nbsp;In a detailed post, Technology Consultant George Ou outlined &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.formortals.com/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/57/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;how a single BitTorrent user can ruin the broadband experience&lt;/a&gt; in a typical household.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on ISP throttling detection:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;HotHardware &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hothardware.com/News/Google_To_Develop_ISP_Throttling_Detector/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/google-develop-software-detect-isp-throttling/2008-06-17#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/isp-0">Isp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/net-neutrality">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/software-tools-0">Software Tools</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:41:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">51802 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast testing new methods of throttling bandwidth</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/comcast-testing-new-methods-throttling-bandwidth/2008-06-06?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the wake of the furor over the way Comcast uses TCP reset flags to throttle BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer (P2P) traffic, the company is testing out a trio of protocol agnostic methods for controlling network congestion. The tests are being conducted in Pennsylvania and Virginia, as well as a third one slated for Colorado Springs later this year.&amp;nbsp;Different types of hardware and configurations will be utilized at every location, with Comcast tightlipped about the exact hardware or rules used to manage the flow of traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever it is, as Comcast has promised to drop its current practice of discriminating against P2P traffic by this year, it certainly will finalize on one method and get it rolled-out nation-wide before then.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more Comcast:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;The Register &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/05/comcast_blacklists/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/comcast-testing-new-methods-throttling-bandwidth/2008-06-06#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/comcast">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/net-neutrality">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/network-congestion">Network Congestion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/p2p-0">P2p</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/protocol-0">Protocol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/traffic">traffic</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:00:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">50031 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DOS attack against Revision3’s services traced to MediaDefender</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/dos-attack-downed-revision3-s-services-traced-mediadefender/2008-05-30?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Revision3, an online media company, has alleged that an outage experienced over Memorial Day weekend was traced to a Denial of Service (DOS) attack initiated by servers owned by anti-piracy group MediaDefender. &lt;a href=&quot;http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3&quot;&gt;In a detailed blog&lt;/a&gt;, Revision3 CEO Jim Louderback detailed their network sleuthing, which traced the offending DOS network packets back to MediaDefender.&amp;nbsp;The shocker was when both the CEO and the Vice President of Operations at MediaDefender admitted that they have been injecting a broad array of torrents--without authorization--into Revision3&#039;s BitTorrent tracking server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This all was made possible by a misconfiguration at Revision3. Revision3 unwittingly closed the backdoor just prior to the weekend which,&amp;nbsp;Louderback hypothesized, caused MediaDefender&#039;s servers to throw &quot;an epic tantrum&quot;, slinging upward of 8,000 SYN packets a second at Revision3.&amp;nbsp;Revision3 uses BitTorrent to host its own legal content. The FBI are looking into the matter now, but it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more about the alleged DOS attack:&lt;br /&gt;- check out this &lt;em&gt;InformationWeek &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208401045&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/story/dos-attack-downed-revision3-s-services-traced-mediadefender/2008-05-30#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/denial-service">denial of service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/fbi">fbi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/mediadefender">Mediadefender</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/revision3">Revision3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 07:17:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48707 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TorrentSpy gets shut down in the U.S.</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercecio.com/techwatch/story/torrentspy-gets-shut-down-u-s/2007-08-28?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FC0</link>
 <description>&lt;P&gt;Seeing how no readers of &lt;EM&gt;DailyTechRag&lt;/em&gt; would ever download copyrighted media from the Internet with the aid of BitTorrent files, this is likely the first you&#039;ve heard of TorrentSpy, a popular Torrent search engine. If you really haven&#039;t heard of TorrentSpy before, I&#039;m afraid it&#039;s too late: the site has officially blocked access to users whose IP addresses originate in the United States. This comes as no surprise, as the Dutch company that runs the site has been involved in a bitter legal battle with the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) during recent months. Despite this fact, TorrentSpy claims that the shutdown is unrelated to the site&#039;s legal woes. &quot;TorrentSpy&#039;s decision to stop accepting U.S. visitors was not compelled by any court,&quot; the company said in a statement. &quot;Rather, it arises out of an uncertain legal climate in the United States regarding user privacy and the apparent tension between U.S. and European Union Internet privacy laws.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exactly what &quot;user privacy&quot; issues are the folks at TorrentSpy concerned about?&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/em&gt; reports that a U.S. district judge has just ruled to uphold an earlier ruling that will require &quot;server logging so the Motion Picture Association of America can obtain the IP addresses of those connecting to BitTorrent files via the service.&quot; That&#039;s a big win for the studios--if only TorrentSpy hadn&#039;t just blocked American traffic from site, thereby making the server logs totally irrelevant to the MPAA. According to TorrentSpy, the site will remain open for users outside of the U.S., though the company&#039;s future still remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For more on TorrentSpy&#039;s shutdown:&lt;BR /&gt;- see this &lt;EM&gt;ZDnet&lt;/em&gt; &lt;A href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6204618.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- and this &lt;EM&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/em&gt; &lt;A href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070828-judge-torrentspy-must-preserve-data-in-ram.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercecio.com/techwatch/story/torrentspy-gets-shut-down-u-s/2007-08-28#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/tags/bittorrent">BitTorrent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercecio.com/flags/tech-watch">Tech Watch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:59:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21137 at http://www.fiercecio.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
